S23 / Assess

Raw data review.

Forensic-level review of raw data — chromatograms, electronic records, CRFs, data integrity check aligned to ALCOA+.

4 min read

You'll leave with: What forensic raw-data review surfaces that documentation review cannot — particularly for chromatographic data.

/ Who this is for

The fit.

Sponsors with diligence concerns. Generic sponsors pre-ANDA. Indian CROs with post-incident integrity questions.

/ The work itself

What this delivers.

Forensic data integrity report. ALCOA+ scoring. Specific findings on chromatographic data, electronic records, CRFs.

/ Why this matters

Where the edge is.

Bioanalytical chromatographic-data depth. ALCOA+ rigour. India-context awareness for post-Synapse data-integrity questions.

/ How engagement runs

The shape of the work.

Every engagement is scoped per situation. The shape — focused diagnostic, structured implementation, ongoing partnership — emerges from the discovery conversation rather than a fixed package. Some engagements are short and intense; some are months-long structural builds; some are recurring quality oversight. We talk first, then scope.

Discovery.

Confirm dataset scope and integrity questions.

Scoping.

Proposal aligned to dataset size and review depth.

Review.

Forensic-level data review with audit-trail discipline.

Report.

ALCOA+ scoring, specific findings, remediation roadmap.

What to do next.

If this is the work in front of you, the next step is a conversation. I read every message and respond personally. No contact forms. No sales sequence. Just a discovery conversation to understand whether the fit is real, and what the shape of the work would be.

Cadence promise: I publish weekly on regulated AI governance. If a week is missed, the journal entry explaining why goes up in real-time.

DM on LinkedIn → Email → Browse all collaboration shapes →