Facts and interpretation stay separate.
auditable readingSource fact
The AI Act is horizontal EU legislation with phased obligations and actor-specific duties.
iFeed reading
The operating problem is not only legal classification; it is keeping classification, literacy, oversight, documentation, and monitoring traceable.
Operational meaning
Teams should create AI inventories and decision files before claiming readiness.
Do not overclaim
Do not label every AI tool high-risk; classification depends on intended purpose and role.
The useful question is what work this creates.
iFeed meaningArticle 3 definitions
Definitions drive actor, system, risk, and literacy interpretation.
Article 4 AI literacy
Providers and deployers need literacy measures appropriate to role, context, and people affected.
High-risk classification
Teams need a documented classification decision rather than a loose label.
Provider / deployer roles
Obligations depend on role, control, intended use, and deployment context.
Human oversight
Oversight becomes a planned operating control, not a vague ethical statement.
Technical documentation
Traceable records connect design, risk, data, testing, and user-facing information.
Current public sources for EU AI Act.
official firstThese links are the public source anchors for this workspace. Interpretation, checklists, and future assets should point back here before being reused outside iFeed.
Regulation (EU) 2024/1689
2024-07-12 · Primary source for articles, definitions, annexes, obligations, and application dates.
European Commission AI Act policy page
Current · Commission implementation context, timeline framing, and policy explanation.
AI literacy questions and answers
Current · Commission-facing practical Q&A for Article 4 AI literacy expectations.
AI Act implementation timeline
Current · Application milestones and phased implementation context for public tracking.