Facts and interpretation stay separate.
auditable readingSource fact
GAMP is industry guidance; Annex 11 is public EU GMP guidance for computerized systems.
iFeed reading
AI validation should be framed as lifecycle evidence: intended use, GxP impact, supplier, data, change, and monitoring.
Operational meaning
Validation plans should expose where AI changes risk, test strategy, review, and periodic monitoring.
Do not overclaim
Do not treat GAMP as law or reproduce protected guide content.
The useful question is what work this creates.
iFeed meaningIntended use and GxP impact
Validation depth follows use, patient/product impact, and regulated process dependency.
System lifecycle
Evidence should cover selection, design/configuration, verification, operation, change, and retirement.
Supplier assessment
Vendor capability and outsourced responsibilities need documented review.
Data integrity
ALCOA+ style concerns appear in records, audit trails, access, and retention.
AI model behaviour
AI-enabled functions need boundaries, monitoring, and human review where needed.
Paid-source boundary
GAMP 5 can be linked and interpreted at a public-safe level, but protected guide content must not be reproduced.
Current public sources for GAMP 5 / AI.
official firstThese links are the public source anchors for this workspace. Interpretation, checklists, and future assets should point back here before being reused outside iFeed.
ISPE GAMP 5 official publication page
Current · Source-owner page for GAMP 5. Public pages must not reproduce protected guidance content.
European Commission EudraLex Volume 4
Current · Official page for EU GMP chapters and annexes, including computerized-system context such as Annex 11.
EU GMP Annex 11 Computerised Systems
2011-06-30 · Public EU GMP source for computerized systems in GMP contexts.